Top Performing Decklists
| Deck | Creator | Record | Best Finish |
|---|
Performance Stats (Last 14 Days)
Win Rate Impact
Top Table Win Rate
Meta Trend
Sample Size
Tournament Results
Average Copies
Archetypes Using This Card:
Abzan Pixie , Dimir Control , Dimir Midrange , Esper Pixie , Golgari Midrange , Orzhov Pixie , Sultai Control , Sultai Dragons
Meta Performance Analysis
Whip of Erebos ranks #3481 out of approximately 4236 cards in raw efficiency (top 82%).
Game Impact Factor
Color Differential
Black average: 51.1%
Performance compared to other Black cardsBased on our comprehensive multi-metric analysis, Whip of Erebos is an underperforming card in the current meta.
Recommended number of copies: 1
Win Rate Timeline
Card Efficiency Analysis
Raw Efficiency (Win Rate/Mana)
Relative Efficiency
Performance Efficiency: 3.21 (Win rate × Top 8 rate ÷ Mana value)
At 4 mana, the average win rate in the format is 47.5%. Whip of Erebos has a win rate of 48.1%, making it 1.1% better than other 4-mana cards.
Top Performing Partners
| Card Name | Type | Deck Count | Win Rate | 1st Places |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nightveil Specter | Creature — Specter | 5 | 55.5% | 0 |
| Dark Betrayal | Instant | 6 | 54.6% | 0 |
| Pack Rat | Creature — Rat | 5 | 53.0% | 0 |
| Devour Flesh | Instant | 7 | 48.0% | 0 |
| Desecration Demon | Creature — Demon | 7 | 46.8% | 0 |
| Ultimate Price | Instant | 7 | 46.8% | 0 |
| Duress | Sorcery | 6 | 46.3% | 0 |
| Gray Merchant of Asphodel | Creature — Zombie | 6 | 46.3% | 0 |
| Pithing Needle | Artifact | 5 | 45.5% | 0 |
| Lifebane Zombie | Creature — Zombie Warrior | 8 | 44.4% | 0 |
Card Synergy Analysis
Cards that perform better with Whip of Erebos than they do on average. A positive synergy score indicates stronger performance together.
| Card Name | Type | Mana | Decks | Win Rate Together | Win Rate Apart | Synergy Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ultimate Price | Instant | 2 | 6 | 62.5% | 49.3% | +13.2% |
| Pack Rat | Creature — Rat | 2 | 5 | 66.7% | 56.2% | +10.5% |
| Nightveil Specter | Creature — Specter | 3 | 5 | 61.9% | 53.5% | +8.5% |
| Dark Betrayal | Instant | 1 | 6 | 59.3% | 52.3% | +7.0% |
| Doom Blade | Instant | 2 | 7 | 61.1% | 55.0% | +6.1% |
| Devour Flesh | Instant | 2 | 7 | 56.4% | 51.2% | +5.2% |
| Erebos, God of the Dead | Legendary Enchantment Creature — God | 4 | 6 | 56.0% | 51.6% | +4.4% |
| Duress | Sorcery | 1 | 6 | 56.5% | 52.6% | +3.9% |
| Underworld Connections | Enchantment — Aura | 3 | 6 | 51.9% | 49.0% | +2.8% |
| Desecration Demon | Creature — Demon | 4 | 7 | 57.1% | 54.6% | +2.5% |
Top Archetypes
| Archetype | Deck Count | % of Archetype | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dimir Midrange | 7 | 0.3% | 50.4% |
| Abzan Pixie | 4 | 10.3% | 26.2% |
| Esper Pixie | 2 | 0.1% | 0.0% |
| Golgari Midrange | 2 | 0.2% | 71.4% |
| Sultai Dragons | 2 | 22.2% | 4.8% |
Statistics Explanation
| Statistic | Description | Formula |
|---|---|---|
| Win Rate Impact | How much this card increases or decreases the win rate of decks that include it, compared to the average deck in the format. | (Win rate of decks with this card) - (Average win rate of all decks) |
| Top Table Win Rate | A weighted win rate that gives more significance to performance in higher tournament placements. First place finishes count for 2x, with diminishing weight down to 8th place. | ∑(wins × placement_weight) / ∑((wins + losses) × placement_weight) |
| Meta Trend | Shows if the card is performing better or worse in the most recent period compared to earlier periods. Positive values indicate improving performance. | (Win rate in recent half of time period) - (Win rate in earlier half of time period) |
| Confidence Factor | A measure of statistical reliability based on sample size. The progress bar indicates how confident we are in the statistics (with larger sample sizes providing higher confidence). | log10(Number of decks + 1) |
| Average Copies | The average number of copies of this card included in decks that use it. | ∑(Copies in each deck) / (Number of decks) |
| Card Synergy Score | Measures how well this card performs with other cards compared to their individual performance. | (Win rate together) - (Average of individual win rates) |
| Raw Efficiency | Win rate points per mana invested. Higher values indicate better returns on mana investment. | (Win rate) / (Mana value) |
| Relative Efficiency | How efficient this card is compared to the average card of the same mana value. | ((Win rate) / (Format average win rate for same mana)) / (Mana value) |
| Performance Efficiency | Combined metric that accounts for win rate, tournament success, and mana investment. | (Win rate × Top 8 placement rate) / (Mana value) |
| Game Impact Factor | A measure of how much this card affects game outcomes, based on win rate adjusted by its deviation from the format average. | Win rate × (1 + (Win rate - Format average) / 100) |
| Color Differential | How this card's win rate compares to the average win rate of other cards of the same color. | Win rate - Average win rate for same color |
All statistics are calculated using tournament data from the selected time period. Sample sizes below 10 decks may not provide statistically significant results.